![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Tags to Meta: Women Being Awesome vs. Women in power
Sunday, 25 August 2013 17:08The Women Being Awesome tag on AO3 is very popular, and for good reason. It's a great, searchable tag that's very useful for those times when searching a character tag yields only fics with minor appearances. If a work it tagged WBA along with your favorite character, you have pretty good odds of her taking a major role, being highly competent, and having an emotional arc.
My problem is I don't usually write about women being awesome. I write about women, put an emphasis on their stories especially when canon has not, expand what was implied, and generally try to go deeper than the source material. But, I don't think my stories fill the implied criteria of women being awesome. Awesome as characters, maybe, but that's a little ambiguous, isn't it? What if I write a story to highlight a woman being terrible? Majorly terrible.
Female villains (antagonists, foils, antiheroes, antivillains, supervillains and etc.) need love. Canon won't treat them well. Not if there's an option for the vilainess to reveal that her primary motivation for evil was yearning for the male hero's dick. Morally ambiguous female characters also get the short shrift, a lot of the time.
It's genuinely hard to write about women being awful under the mantle of strong female characters and good role models for girls. Or even heroines for women who feel like the candy-coated power fantasies marketed to the 18-35 male set will never really scratch their itch. I don't want to fill a tag for Superwomen with stories about Lexettes. I want women in power who are affected by power, changed if not corrupted by it, who want it and use it and sometimes misuse it.
That's what I write, and I think it would be unfair of me to label it something else.
My problem is I don't usually write about women being awesome. I write about women, put an emphasis on their stories especially when canon has not, expand what was implied, and generally try to go deeper than the source material. But, I don't think my stories fill the implied criteria of women being awesome. Awesome as characters, maybe, but that's a little ambiguous, isn't it? What if I write a story to highlight a woman being terrible? Majorly terrible.
Female villains (antagonists, foils, antiheroes, antivillains, supervillains and etc.) need love. Canon won't treat them well. Not if there's an option for the vilainess to reveal that her primary motivation for evil was yearning for the male hero's dick. Morally ambiguous female characters also get the short shrift, a lot of the time.
It's genuinely hard to write about women being awful under the mantle of strong female characters and good role models for girls. Or even heroines for women who feel like the candy-coated power fantasies marketed to the 18-35 male set will never really scratch their itch. I don't want to fill a tag for Superwomen with stories about Lexettes. I want women in power who are affected by power, changed if not corrupted by it, who want it and use it and sometimes misuse it.
That's what I write, and I think it would be unfair of me to label it something else.
